Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2016-06-09-Speech-4-227-125"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20160609.19.4-227-125"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"I recognise the importance of the rail supply industry to the UK and I share our Government’s goal of making the UK a leader in railways. We share the commitment to increase our manufacturing and innovation capability to enhance productivity, skills and employment to support UK economic growth. There is much in the resolution that mirrors this focus, but we do not believe that the International Procurement Instrument (IPI) represents the best way to achieve its stated objectives of opening foreign procurement markets to EU bidders. It also carries a significant risk of retaliatory market closures should it ever be used. Conservatives voted in favour of the resolution but continue to oppose the IPI.
Paragraph 42 stresses the relevance and the impact that the negotiations on the ‘international public procurement instrument’ and the revision of the regulations on trade defence instruments are having on the European rail supply industry, and calls on the Council and the Commission to take this into consideration and to work closely with the European Parliament to reach a swift agreement on these instruments; and it asks the Commission to take into consideration the impacts which the recognition of market economy status for state-run or other non-market economies could have on the functioning of trade defence instruments and the competitiveness of the European rail supply industry."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples