Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-20-Speech-2-347-750"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121120.28.2-347-750"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
The Resale Right Directive was designed to achieve two objectives: on the one hand, to ensure that authors of graphic and plastic works of art share in the economic success of their creations, and, on the other hand, to harmonise the application of the resale right in the EU. The Commission concluded that no clear patterns could be established to link the loss of EU share in the global market for modern and contemporary art with the harmonisation of provisions relating to the application of the resale right in the EU on 1 January 2006. Nor could any clear patterns currently be established that would indicate systematic trade diversion within the EU away from those Member States which introduced the right for living artists in 2006. However, the Commission recognises that there are pressures on European art markets, in all price ranges, and affecting both the auction and dealer sectors. Furthermore, the Commission notes that the quality of the administration of the resale right varies from country to country across the EU. As a result, the burden may be particularly high for those at the lower end of the market that are more deeply affected by the right’s administration costs. In these respects, I believe that the Commission should work closely with stakeholders to strengthen the European art market’s position and to address certain problems and obstacles."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples