Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-25-Speech-4-488-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU strategy for the Danube region (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121025.33.4-488-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-25-Speech-4-489-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Hubert Pirker2
lpv:spokenAs	member; CRIM (2012-03-28--2013-10-23)3 member; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Österreichische Volkspartei (2011-03-31--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2011-04-06--2013-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2011-04-06--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2011-03-31--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, we should, I think, regard the Danube region primarily as a main business route and develop it as such. Then we will know what investments are meaningful and sustainable if a master plan is developed to integrate projects that start in the transport sector, move into the energy sector, integrate industrial policy and, of course, extend to tourist projects. However, this strategy will only be successful if these projects are coordinated with each other. Therefore, I propose that, just as in the execution of the TEN-T core network corridors, a coordinator be appointed and States be obliged to submit timescales and investment plans in order to be able to proceed strategically in a similar way to how the core network corridors should. My question to the Commissioner is: to what extent is he proposing that the development of the Danube corridor, which is one of the 10 core network corridors, should be linked to the development strategy of the Danube region concept?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph