Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-23-Speech-2-509-750"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121023.45.2-509-750"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"−
After presenting the annual report of the European Court of Auditors for the financial year 2010, as part of its discharge procedure for the financial year 2010 the European Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control carried out its financial audit of the implementation of the European Union’s general budget in relation to the European Environment Agency. The primary task of the Committee on Budgetary Control is to scrutinise and ensure that the EU budget is being implemented appropriately and effectively. The discharge report highlights the main problem concerning the European Environment Agency is that several errors relating to public procurement procedure occurred during the Agency’s 2010 management period. The report also draws attention to the fact that several conflicts of interest at the Agency had recently come to light. The committee will not recommend granting the discharge until these issues are clarified. At its sitting in late March, the Committee on Budgetary Control decided to postpone granting the discharge. In the view of the committee, several additional questions relating to Agency management in 2010 require clarification before the Agency is granted discharge. The situation has not changed significantly since spring. In my view the Agency should have made more of an effort to restore appropriate management procedures and comply with operational regulations. Both in the committee and in plenary, I, too, voted in favour of refusing to grant discharge."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples