Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-23-Speech-2-506-375"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121023.45.2-506-375"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"−
After the European Court of Auditors presented its annual report for the financial year 2010, as part of its discharge procedure for the financial year 2010 the European Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control carried out its financial audit of the implementation of the European Union’s general budget in relation to the Council. The primary task of the Committee on Budgetary Control is to scrutinise and ensure that the EU budget is being implemented appropriately and effectively. In its annual report for 2010 based on the inspection carried out by the European Court of Auditors, the committee stated that, overall, for the financial year ending on 31 December 2010, payments by the institutions and agencies relating to administrative and other expenses were free from material errors. The discharge report notes that the financial inspection went smoothly and no major deficiencies were encountered in the course of the inspection. However, the Council failed to make available to Parliament and to the committee a number of documents necessary for conclusion of the discharge procedure. Without these the financial year 2010 cannot be concluded. At its sitting in late March, the Committee on Budgetary Control decided to postpone granting discharge. The second discharge report produced for September presented a similar view to that set out in the spring report. The outcome of the vote in committee was to refuse to grant the Council discharge. In the vote in both the committee and plenary, I, too, voted against granting the Council discharge."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples