Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-05-Speech-4-127-750"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"lt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120705.19.4-127-750"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-05-Speech-4-128-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Vilija Blinkevičiūtė2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; FEMM (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-29--2014-06-30)3 member; EMPL (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-10-07--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Lietuvos socialdemokratų partija (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I voted in favour of this report because the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has proposed several amendments to its Statute, which concern, to varying degrees, the three courts currently making up the CJEU: the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal. The Court considers it desirable to establish the office of Vice-President of the Court of Justice and to amend the rules relating to the composition of the Grand Chamber. The Court of Justice argues that its President’s workload has increased considerably with time and it would therefore be useful to appoint a Vice-President who could relieve or assist him in carrying out his duties in future. As well as substantive changes, the proposals concern staff changes and increases. The Court of Justice argues that for some years now, the gap between the number of cases processed by the General Court and the number of new cases has been widening and that the number of unprocessed cases is rising constantly. Increasing the number of judges is the way to cope with the essential need for effectiveness, urgency, flexibility and consistency in Court of Justice case-law."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph