Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-06-11-Speech-1-029-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-06-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU trade negotiations with Japan (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120611.18.1-029-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-06-11-Speech-1-030-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jarosław Wałęsa2
lpv:spokenAs	member; PETI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; PECH (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; INTA (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Platforma Obywatelska (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr Leichtfried, thank you very much for your question. This would mean we can now pursue a purely academic debate. If the European Parliament is not meant to participate in these negotiations, why do our Rules of Procedure allow us to take the steps to which I referred in my speech? If we do not have the right to voice our doubts and to call on the Council to delay issuing a negotiating mandate, why are those provisions there, when they should be removed? It is my feeling that if the Rules of Procedure clearly state that we can participate in negotiations, then this is all the more reason for us to do so, for our voice to be heard, and for us to draw attention as often as possible to our right to participate. Otherwise, this debate is a purely academic one, but I think it is much more important than that."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph