Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-10-Speech-4-270-250"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120510.69.4-270-250"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The rapporteur proposes that Parliament postpone granting discharge in respect of the implementation of the Council budget, in keeping with its power to make use of the two deadlines in the discharge timetable; the purpose, in this case, is to explore the possibility of reaching an agreement with the Presidency-in-Office. The grounds for this postponement are the Council’s lack of transparency and failure to account for its spending, which have led to the dispute that has been dragging on between the two institutions – Parliament and the Council – for a long time. The entire report criticises the Council’s position, as it is refusing to submit documents relating to implementation of its budget, to meet, or to answer Parliament’s questions on that matter. As a result, Parliament has no knowledge of the Council’s accounts, even though it takes part in the discharge procedure. The rapporteur also puts forward a number of questions for the Council to answer on administrative issues (including some on the European External Action Service) and on the Common Foreign and Security Policy/Common Security and Defence Policy tasks, amongst other matters. We voted for this report."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples