Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-10-Speech-4-263-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120510.69.4-263-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"In general, the rapporteur believes there are sufficient guarantees that the European Parliament budget has been implemented in line with the principles of sound financial management. However, the rapporteur makes some specific criticisms and some suggestions, which we support for the most part, notwithstanding some specific disagreements – that we highlighted during the vote – and a different view of some of the issues included in the resolution. Particularly important are the references to potential savings from better rationalisation of missions between the three sites in Brussels, Luxembourg and Strasbourg; the delays with and considerable increase in the cost of Parliament’s new visitor centre; the cost and lack of clarity associated with the House of European History; and the costs relating to the travel agency. It is noteworthy that the rapporteur proposes abolishing prizes such as the LUX Prize for cinema and also mentions scrapping the Prize for Journalism, but says nothing about the future of the Sakharov Prize, which is the most expensive and has been increased by EUR 352 348 since 2009."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples