Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-04-18-Speech-3-256-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-04-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120418.18.3-256-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-04-18-Speech-3-256-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Andreas Mölzer2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; AFET (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	"The Heads of State or Government of the 27 EU Member States have agreed that the concerns of the Irish people expressed in the context of the amendment of the Treaty of Lisbon will be taken into account through the addition of a protocol to the Treaty. These concerns are in relation to the right to life, family and education, taxation, and security and defence. I see no objections to this, which is why I am in favour of the addition of the protocol. However, certain wording has been quite skilfully incorporated into the report – wording which, in my opinion, is not correct, and which I do not want. For example, it states that nothing in the Treaty of Lisbon makes any change as regards tax matters, but then says that further progress towards enhanced economic coordination in the Union is not ruled out. That, however, is contrary to the Treaty and represents clear interference with the budgetary authority of the Member States, which is something I reject. I was therefore unable to vote in favour of the report, although I am happy to allow the Irish their derogations."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph