Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-26-Speech-1-106-000"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20110926.18.1-106-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"Mr President, the point I want to make is that, because I was called to speak before the Commission, I was not able to react to the Commission statement. Basically I would like to say that my group is, of course, disappointed by the announcement that there will not be any negotiations for a free trade agreement or anything like that. But if there are to be sectoral bilateral agreements, is this a way for the Commission to circumvent the rights of this Parliament to be involved with the legislative process in enacting these agreements? If there were a fourth free trade agreement, then Parliament would be involved with the assent process. If there are only individual agreements by sector, is this a way for the Commission to stitch the whole thing up without it going through a full hearing before this Parliament? That is a question for the Commissioner to respond to."@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
lpv:videoURI

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph