Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-06-Speech-3-317-046"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110706.18.3-317-046"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-06-Speech-3-317-0622
lpv:speaker	lp:Göran Färm, Anna Hedh, Olle Ludvigsson, Marita Ulvskog and Åsa Westlund (S&D )2
lpv:translated text	"Paragraph 14 of this motion for a resolution talks in positive terms of the creation of a public European Credit Rating Agency. We can see that this could be a means of putting pressure on the large private agencies. At the same time, we see fundamental problems with this. It would therefore be beneficial to get a better picture of both the advantages and disadvantages of a public agency by means of a detailed study. A better knowledge base is required in order to enable further discussion of this matter to be constructive. Paragraph 45 welcomes the introduction of a system of European border guards. We voted against this, as we believe that border controls should continue to be the responsibility of the Member States. Furthermore, paragraph 46 welcomes a new framework for Frontex that is designed to strengthen its operational capacity on the EU’s external borders. We do not believe that Frontex should be strengthened. Instead, we believe that adequate guarantees should be given that the organisation respects human rights in all of its operations. In spite of these objections, we chose to vote in favour of the resolution as a whole."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph