Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-05-Speech-2-810-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Aviation security with a special focus on security scanners - Liquids (LAG) ban on aircrafts (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"et"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110705.42.2-810-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-05-Speech-2-811-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Vilja Savisaar-toomast2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Eesti Keskerakond (2009-07-14--2012-05-13)3 member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; ALDE (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Aviation security is a very important and relevant topic, and it is very much to be welcomed that we are discussing it today. According to Eurostat data, there were 751 million air passengers in the European Union in 2009, and for those and other people it is important to guarantee security on aeroplanes and in airports. I think that this report, which deals with aviation security, and above all security scanners, is necessary in order to ensure the rational and justified use of new technologies. At the same time, keeping in mind the health of passengers and employees, it is important to use those technologies that are safest for human health, and it is also important that in future contact with cumulative ionising radiation should not be permitted, and as a result they should be clearly ruled out. Many have expressed concern that the body images generated by security scanners are too revealing, but I dare say that is not the case. Having personally tested this, I know what kind of image is generated, and I find nothing revealing about it. The report states that all security scanners should use a stick figure to protect travellers’ identities and to ensure that they cannot be identified on the basis of an image of any body part. The report clearly states that data obtained from scanning must not be used for any purpose other than the identification of prohibited objects. These data may only be used during the time required for the scanning procedure. They must be destroyed as soon as the person has passed through the security inspection, and they must not be stored. Thank you."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph