Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-23-Speech-4-334-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20110623.37.4-334-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The recommendation applies to the Safety Agreement signed on behalf of the European Community in May 2009. From the perspective of concluding the Agreement on civil aviation safety, which supplements the Air Transport Agreement, Canada was properly regarded as a priority, because both Europe and Canada host manufacturers of aircraft, engines and avionics, occupying a leading position on the world market. Just as with the similar Air Safety Agreement with the US, the main objective was to minimise duplication of assessments, tests and inspections, and to enable the EU and Canada to rely on each other’s certification systems. The agreement thus generally follows the structure of the existing bilateral agreements on civil aviation safety concluded between the Member States and Canada. It assigns obligations and sets out methods of cooperation, based on mutual trust in the systems of the other party, and on a comparison of regulatory differences. European and Canadian companies will save millions of euro a year thanks to shorter, simpler and less costly product approval procedures and the mutual recognition of findings relating to certification. It will also be of benefit to the airlines, representing a major advance in terms of establishing international standards in the area of civil aviation safety. I therefore take the view that it is right for Parliament to approve the conclusion of the Agreement, as it will make both the Canadian and the European markets more competitive and at the same time safer."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples