Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-09-Speech-4-068-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Stress tests of nuclear power plants in EU and nuclear safety in EU neighbourhood countries (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110609.5.4-068-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-09-Speech-4-069-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Teresa Riera Madurell2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partido Socialista Obrero Español (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2011-05-09--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; SEDE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, Mr Reul, you are the chair of the committee. Ladies and gentlemen, let us all calm down a little. Commissioner, in the meeting that we had on the day before your meeting with the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group (ENSREG), my group explained to you what our position on this question was. Now I must tell you we are not totally satisfied. Why is this? This is so because we believe that the stress tests should have been made obligatory. However, we are pleased to hear that the 143 European nuclear plants are going to be subject to the stress tests, and we also support the Commission in its efforts to persuade third countries to re-evaluate their plants as well. Furthermore, we are not satisfied because we believe that stress tests, which, in fact, are going to be carried out by the operators themselves, should be subjected to a second opinion in order to ensure greater objectivity. The peer review method, involving seven experts, is one step. However, our group’s proposal was to create an independent control mechanism which was supposed to operate from the outset and not in the later results analysis phase. We also think that the tests should be carried out on other facilities, such as research reactors, and in respect of other threats, such as the fallout from a terrorist attack or a plant’s structural weaknesses. We are conscious of the competition issues that have arisen but we think that a better agreement could have been reached. Carrying out a risk analysis now is an appropriate but isolated measure. Therefore, to guarantee maximum safety, my group proposes that an independent organisation be created at a European level that would assume responsibility for safety and control. Finally, Commissioner, I would like to say to you that what we hope for now is consistency, so that reactors that do not pass the tests and that cannot remedy their deficiencies are closed, and transparency, so that all citizens have complete information about the test procedure and results."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph