Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-02-16-Speech-3-363-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-02-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110216.11.3-363-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-02-16-Speech-3-364-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Diogo Feio2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partido Popular (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (2009-10-08--2011-07-31)3
lpv:translated text	"− Croatia has been meeting the accession criteria with undeniable success, and has been making an effort to continue down this path, despite the additional difficulties it faces in the current international situation. It is a good example for any country intending to become part of the European Union. I cannot fail to notice that the most recent surveys show Croatians to be suspicious of their country’s future entry into the Union and critical of the EU’s actions. Instead of questioning the opinion of the Croatian people, I believe that their doubts merit serious reflection on how the European Union has been run. I find it regrettable that, in her motion for a resolution, the rapporteur has chosen to give opinions about issues such as sexual orientation and its constitutional protection, which not only have nothing to do with the real issues in question, but should also be the exclusive competence of the Member States."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph