Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-21-Speech-4-172"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-10-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101021.19.4-172"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-10-21-Speech-4-1732
lpv:speaker	lp:Ville Itälä2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Kansallinen Kokoomus (2009-07-14--2012-02-29)3 member; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2012-02-29)3 substitute; AGRI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-07-14--2012-02-29)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2012-02-29)3 member; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-06-17--2011-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, yesterday we did indeed vote on Mrs Estrela’s important report on maternity leave, how long it should be, and the money paid while it lasts. After this vote the media called and asked me a number of times whether I had voted for or against. I said that I had voted for women. I voted for maternity leave to last 18 weeks and for women to receive 75% of their pay. I think that we have a good system in my country, Finland. If they adopted the system that we agreed on yesterday there, the position of women in the labour market would be substantially weaker, because employers would have to continue to agonise over whether they could take young women on, because the costs of maternity leave would increase significantly. Opportunities for women to find work would therefore decline. That is why I wanted to make this statement."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph