Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-06-15-Speech-2-197"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-06-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Proposal for a decision on the setting up and numerical strength of the Delegation to the CARIFORUM-EC Parliamentary Committee (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100615.23.2-197"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-06-15-Speech-2-1982
lpv:speaker	lp:Bruno Gollnisch2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Front national (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; BUDG (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I heard you and I paid close attention to what you said. You said that 168 was the threshold for a qualified majority. This is what I heard, or in any case this is what the translation said. I find this quite incredible because if this is the case, we would somehow be taking half the number of those who voted in favour to be the voting threshold. So whatever happens, there will always be a qualified majority. That is obvious. This is the first time I have heard that 168 votes is a qualified majority in this Parliament. Perhaps I misunderstood what you said, but this whole procedure seems to me to be utterly absurd. It may be suitable for an election where there are several candidates, but certainly not for renewing a Vice-President’s mandate."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph