Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-03-25-Speech-4-037"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20100325.3.4-037"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, I shall avoid the military language which the previous speaker used. The language of war does not suit the style of banks. I am a representative of what is probably the only political group in this Parliament which has attracted the majority of its members from outwith the euro area. Only two are in euroland. My point of view, therefore, will be different.
Mr Trichet’s speech can be summed up by the number 36, because this is how many Members of the European Parliament were listening to his speech. Does this mean we are lazy? No – it means, in fact, that MEPs do not really believe the European Central Bank can be a solution, a remedy, to the crisis, or that it can be a lifebelt. Mr Rehn said the euro area is something of value in itself, and then spoke about the crisis in Greece. There is a certain contradiction here. Greece is currently going through a crisis because it entered that oasis of stability too soon. We should avoid such inconsistency."@en1
|
lpv:videoURI |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples