Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-11-23-Speech-1-101"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-11-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:European Crime Prevention Network (EUCPN) - Rules on the confidentiality of Europol information - Implementing rules governing Europol’s relations with partners, including the exchange of personal data and classified information - List of third States and organisations for Europol agreements - Implementing rules for Europol analysis work files - Accreditation of forensic laboratory activities (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091123.18.1-101"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-11-23-Speech-1-1022
lpv:speaker	lp:Sophia in 't Veld2
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, I will be very brief in order to make up for Mr Nicholson and ensure that we do not run late. The Lisbon Treaty will be in force – if I calculate correctly – seven days and five hours from now. I must say that the rush by the Council to adopt a whole series of decisions is somewhat embarrassing in the light of this. What I also find embarrassing is that there is an empty seat here, where I would have hoped to see the Council so that we could actually have an exchange of views. I basically endorse the proposals made by the previous speaker. Of course, we support the development of Europol. We want a strong Europol. We want a Europol that is able to operate and fight against crime, but we also want a Europol that is subject to democratic scrutiny. I therefore endorse the proposal made by the previous speaker to ask the Council to withdraw the proposals on Europol and present a new proposal within a maximum of six months – and preferably earlier – under the Lisbon Treaty. Finally, when it comes to the specific subject that I am rapporteur for – which is Europol and the transfer of personal data and confidential documents to third parties – I would like to hear from the Council – which is absent – on how it feels about the analysis made by the European Parliament’s Legal Service to the effect that the legal basis chosen for this particular proposal is the wrong one. I do not know who is going to answer for the Council, but maybe it can come back on this and send somebody who can provide us with a reply."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2009-07-20--2014-06-30)3,3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 unknown; Democraten 66 (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 substitute; Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (2009-10-08--2010-01-27)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 vice-chair; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Sophia in 't Veld,"1 "rapporteur."1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph