Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-02-18-Speech-3-271"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-02-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Community legal framework for a European Research Infrastructure (ERI) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090218.25.3-271"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-02-18-Speech-3-2722
lpv:speaker	lp:Nils Lundgren2
lpv:spokenAs	member; IND/DEM (2008-05-09--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; CONT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Junilistan (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"( ) Do we need a European economic legal entity in the research sector or is this yet another example of the EU’s persistent fight against European pluralism? The truth is, of course, that institutional competition is necessary for successful institutional reforms. Imagine if an international legal research framework had been established 50 years ago. Development in this area would have ceased. Changing international treaties is difficult and proceeds far too slowly. Progress is made if countries can easily reform their national institutions. Successful reforms then spread to other countries. The Commission’s proposal is certainly not a straightjacket. It offers an alternative to existing national proposals and, to that extent, represents an improvement. However, the proposal is ruined completely by the fact that the Commission also wishes to regulate the taxation of this legal entity at EU level. This proposal must therefore be rejected."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Nils Lundgren,"1 "SV"1 "on behalf of the IND/DEM Group."1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph