Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-02-02-Speech-1-998"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-02-02"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Consequences of the recent gas crisis - Second Strategic Energy Review - Challenge of energy efficiency through information and communication technologies (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090202.16.1-998"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-02-02-Speech-1-9972
lpv:speaker	lp:Cristian-Silviu Buşoi2
lpv:spokenAs	member; SEDE (2007-12-13--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2007-12-13--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2007-12-13--2009-07-13)3 member; ALDE (2007-12-10--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Partidul Naţional Liberal (2007-12-10--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AFET (2007-12-12--2009-07-13)3 member; IMCO (2007-12-12--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"I would like to thank Mrs Laperrouze for this report and say that I support the majority of its conclusions. The EU must be ambitious in the battle against climate change, which means that the role of nuclear power and renewable energy sources cannot be discounted. The process of creating a single market for electricity and natural gas must be accelerated. This requires interconnections. I therefore welcome the European Commission’s proposal to allocate EUR 1.5 billion to interconnection projects. In addition, the criteria established in Barcelona for interconnection must be met by all Member States. It is also necessary to improve energy efficiency, especially in the new Member States. In Romania, for example, there is huge potential for making savings and I would like this opportunity to be utilised. The Russia-Ukraine crisis has highlighted once again the need for a common EU approach. I support the report’s conclusion, including the point about signing an agreement between the EU, Russia and Ukraine. However, I do not agree with the statement about the South Stream project being a vital project for the EU’s energy security to the same degree as Nabucco. South Stream is a rival project to Nabucco and does not meet at all the needs to diversify energy supply sources in order to guarantee the EU’s energy security. This is why I am suggesting that in the future we need to pay more attention to the position given to this project in the various EP documents."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph