Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-12-04-Speech-4-023"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-12-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:State of the negotiations on the climate change and energy package (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20081204.3.4-023"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-12-04-Speech-4-0242
lpv:speaker	lp:Alessandro Foglietta2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 treasurer; UEN (2004-11-14--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Canada (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; CULT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Alleanza nazionale (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-05-10--2009-02-04)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the new 20/20/20 formula used to sum up Europe’s targets to combat climate change, is an ambitious commitment which would make Europe the undeniable leader in this global battle. To be honest, I should highlight the difference between the universal nature of this target and the unilateral approach of Europe’s obligations. In my opinion, we should be bold enough to admit that this demonstration of our ability could prove to be, at the same time, of no use for the environment and crippling for our industry, if it is not considered in multilateral negotiations. Obviously, we all support the aim of protecting the environment, but in order to do this, we have to identify the most effective instruments, which enjoy broad support. It is essential that these two conditions be combined, as having one without the other would frustrate all our efforts and could even have irreparable consequences for our industry. A cost-benefits analysis is, therefore, fundamental. I would stress that an approach of this kind in no way means gauging or questioning the importance of safeguarding the planet; I simply believe that the instruments which comprise the climate and energy package, first and foremost revision of the ETS directive, must be carefully evaluated, including in terms of the economic or bureaucratic burdens on our businesses and the public purse, as well as in terms of the competitiveness of European manufacturing, with special emphasis on small and medium-sized enterprises. This line of reasoning is legitimate, especially at a time when the global economy is hostage to a poor economic climate, calling for a fresh analysis of the philosophy of the package: I am referring to a review of the criteria used to calculate the national targets. Above all, it is imperative to take full advantage of the so-called flexibility mechanisms and only then can we hope to remain competitive at global level. I will conclude by stressing that, at this time, it is more vital than ever to avoid attempts to exploit divisions between defenders of industry and champions of the environment."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph