Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-10-09-Speech-4-216"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20081009.25.4-216"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
". −
The explanatory statement accompanying this report excelled in demonstrating what is actually at stake and therefore justified our vote against the report.
The rapporteur confirms that Ukraine’s accession to the WTO would pave ‘the way to the creation of a comprehensive EU/Ukraine Free Trade Area, including further commitments in trade in services’ and that, to achieve that objective, ‘Ukraine needs to undertake domestic reforms and hold ambitious talks with the EU’.
Based on this premise, the rapporteur gives some examples:
‘speed up further integration of Ukraine’s transport infrastructure, in particular ports and waterways, into the European transport network’;
‘full inclusion of Ukraine in the “Single European Sky”, which may imply some liberalisation of aviation-related activities including airports’;
‘insists on the fact that a proper functioning energy market and an efficient oil and gas transit policy are the necessary preconditions for the full integration of Ukraine into the EU energy system’;
‘The conclusion of the FTA make it possible to not only eliminate restrictions on the movement of capital, but also restrictions on financial services’.
More words for what purpose..."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples