Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-09-23-Speech-2-438"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-09-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Proceedings before the Court of Justice (Amendment of Rule 121) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080923.41.2-438"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-09-23-Speech-2-4392
lpv:speaker	lp:Georgios Papastamkos2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; JURI (2008-02-19--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AFCO (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; INTA (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2007-01-18--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Nea Dimokratia (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, as rapporteur – of the Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats, that is – I wish to say that tonight we are discussing an issue that concerns the organisational autonomy and sovereignty of the European Parliament. The Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament form a regulatory nexus based on the long-term validity of individual provisions. By this, I do not mean provisions that are applicable pending an amendment, but those with regulatory durability and robustness. I shall not mention the more specific aspects of the dispute settlement procedure described in the text of the amendment – Mr Botopoulos has in any case covered this aspect accurately and thoroughly. The text of the amendment proposed by the rapporteur is the outcome of conciliation between the PPE-DE Group and the Socialist Group in the European Parliament. The paragraph added to the existing text of Rule 121 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament deals with a potential difference of opinion between the President of Parliament and the Committee on Legal Affairs on a decision concerning submitting comments and interventions by Parliament during proceedings before the Court of Justice. Until now, there has not been a clear, explicit provision on such cases in the Rules of Procedure, and the amendment we are discussing serves to close this legal loophole and this regulatory gap in the internal workings of Parliament."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph