Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-04-24-Speech-4-152"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-04-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080424.18.4-152"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-04-24-Speech-4-1532
lpv:speaker	lp:Bruno Gollnisch2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 member; NA (2007-11-14--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"This proposes nothing more nor less than the transformation of the WTO into a new centre of world governance, with a secretariat with a stronger role and prerogatives modelled on the European Commission (staff, right of initiative, and so on), a parliamentary assembly, etc., all coordinated with other bodies that want to control the world. Paradoxically, it seeks to justify consensus, that is to say unanimity, which, I quote, 'guarantees, unlike majority (or weighted) voting, the equality of all members'. In fact, that equality is trampled upon in the European Union. Equally paradoxically, it asks that trade negotiations and the settlement of disputes should clearly encompass social, environmental and 'humanist' considerations, whereas applications for accession would only be considered from a commercial point of view! A sort of justification of the massive approval by this Parliament of the accession of China to the WTO, when it is now complaining of social dumping by that country, not to mention its repeated human rights violations."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"ex post"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph