Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-07-11-Speech-3-410"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20070711.34.3-410"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Question No 6 will not be answered, given that the issue with which it deals is already on today’s agenda.
As they deal with the same subject, the following questions will be taken together:
Question No 7 by Mairead McGuinness ()
There is an increasing body of evidence showing that the standards and controls in place in the Brazilian beef sector are deeply flawed, open to widespread abuse and nowhere near as stringent as equivalent rules applicable to European farmers - yet the EU continues to accept imports of Brazilian beef.
In this context, does the Council intend to act to protect Europe's beef producers and consumers, and to ensure that producers and consumers can be confident that all beef on the European market adheres to the same high standards?
Question No 8 by Liam Aylward ()
Can the European Council make a statement as to whether it intends to pursue an individual deal between the EU and Brazil concerning Brazilian beef imports into the EU if the WTO negotiations fail to make progress in the coming months? For such a deal between Brazil and the EU to go ahead, does the European Council have to give Commissioner Mandelson the mandate to conclude such an arrangement, or does Commissioner Mandelson already have this power to conclude such a deal under his negotiating terms of reference"@en1
|
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"Subject: EU imports of Brazilian beef"1
"Subject: Separate EU-Brazil deal on the beef sector"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples