Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-03-13-Speech-2-123"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-03-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070313.16.2-123"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-03-13-Speech-2-1242
lpv:speaker	lp:Lydia Schenardi2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; FEMM (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; ITS (2007-01-15--2007-11-13)3 substitute; AGRI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Five days on from International Women’s Day, the European Parliament is proposing a roadmap for equality between men and women. Is the timing a coincidence? The fact remains that women are at the forefront, if not in reality, then at least in the texts. The report presented to us proposes a near exhaustive list of the measures to be taken to guarantee equality between women and men. While numerous proposals have been put forward, not least those relating to the measures aimed at better reconciling the obligations of family and professional life, it must unfortunately be said that many worrying and meaningless points feature in this report. I am talking, for example, about yet another attempt to introduce a system of quotas for the recruitment and participation of women in all economic and political sectors. We know that this measure can only be counterproductive in terms of the way in which women are portrayed and thought of. However, I am also talking about the pointless proposal to create a ‘Ms Lisbon’ in charge of ensuring that the Lisbon Strategy is implemented properly: a kind of ‘European superwoman’. Proposals such as this only discredit the initiatives taken to promote women."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph