Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-13-Speech-3-479"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-12-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Development of the second-generation Schengen Information System (regulation) – Development of the second-generation Schengen Information System (decision) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061213.41.3-479"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-12-13-Speech-3-4802
lpv:speaker	lp:Adam Bielan2
lpv:spokenAs	treasurer; UEN (2004-07-20--2007-08-28)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-09-04)3 unknown; Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; IMCO (2006-01-16--2007-01-14)3 substitute; AFET (2005-12-05--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-10-28--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, the Schengen Information System, or SIS, as it is known, is a database which allows the appropriate authorities in the Member States to cooperate and to exchange information for the purpose of creating an area without internal border controls. This system makes it significantly easier for the citizens of the European Union to travel and gives the forces of law and order better conditions under which to fight crime. However, SIS has been up and running since 1995. This is a very long time in an age of extremely rapid progress in the field of information technology. That is why, as early as in December of 2001, exactly five years ago, the Council assigned the Commission with setting up a second generation SIS II system. It is vital for the expansion of the Schengen area to include the new Member States. It is hardly surprising that public opinion in these countries is concerned whenever it hears about delays in implementing this system. Although European Union home affairs ministers have recently decided that eight out of the ten new Member States will join the Schengen area in late 2007 and early 2008, which means being in the SIS I system for a while, this is a stopgap solution, which will be costly and far from perfect. I hope that the Commission will learn some lessons from the delay in implementing the SIS II system and that, in the future, it will work more efficiently on projects that are important to the European Union as a whole."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph