Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-15-Speech-3-207"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Commission Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060215.14.3-207"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-15-Speech-3-2082
lpv:speaker	lp:Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 member; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)3,3 unknown; Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (2004-07-20--2006-10-04)3,3 vice-president; European Parliament (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)3,3 member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)3,3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-05-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 43 by Henrik Dam Kristensen () The agreement on sugar reform opens up the possibility for some Member States to pay national aid to sugar beet producers. What then is the Commission's position in principle on the use of national aid as a regulatory instrument under the common agricultural policy? Is it an instrument that the Commission may be expected to use in connection with future proposals or is it being used in connection with the sugar reform by way of exception? How does the Commission view the prospects for phasing out subsidies for agricultural production in the EU in the event of total or partial renationalisation of agricultural aid?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: Sugar agreement and renationalisation of the common agricultural policy"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph