Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-10-26-Speech-3-122"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20051026.13.3-122"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
". Mr McCreevy made it clear last night when speaking on this subject that he does not intend to respect the Directive prohibiting any human cloning when he said that even though reproductive cloning was excluded under the directive he left the door open for the possibility of therapeutic cloning. In doing this McCreevy is once again giving "the two finger". This time to the Council of Minister and the Biopatents Directive. "A. Council memorandum on the common position on the Biopatnents Directive states, at point 35, that: 'At (a) in paragraph 2, the Council replaced 'procedures for human reproductive cloning' with 'procedure for the cloning of human beings', since it thought the adjective 'reproductive' could be too restrictive. It was understood that the words 'human being' referred to human being from embryonic state'. It would seem that Mr McCreevy is anticipating is ignoring the EU's existing Directives and anticipating the now defunct Constitution."@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph