Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-10-26-Speech-3-081"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-10-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20051026.13.3-081"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-10-26-Speech-3-0822
lpv:speaker	lp:Glyn Ford2
lpv:spoken text	". I will be voting in favour of the report despite reservations. The legal base is an important issue. The proposal for a split legal base of Article 175 and Article 95 for Articles 7, 8 and 9 seemed the best solution, rather than Article 175 on its own, to maintain vital elements of a single market approach rather than renationalising the industry. Arguments for allowing higher standards in those Member States that want them are seductive. But just how far can we follow such a route without endangering wider interests? I welcome the moves to limit the further enlargement of the list of prohibited gases. Technically it is possible, but it may be expensive, both for the consumers and for the environment, with sharp rises in energy consumption of up to 40%. At this stage we should leave these further bans for assessment by the Commission as to the overall impact they would have on the economy and environment."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Labour and the Gibraltar Socialist Labour Party (2004-11-08--2009-07-13)3 member; INTA (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Glyn Ford (PSE ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph