Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-08-Speech-4-047"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-09-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Tourism and development2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050908.5.4-047"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-09-08-Speech-4-0482
lpv:speaker	lp:Luca Romagnoli2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2007-01-14)3 member; TRAN (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; EMPL (2004-07-27--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Movimento Sociale Fiamma tricolore (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I have to agree on the importance of tourism as an economic factor and a factor for sustainable development. I have some doubts, however, about the Cornillet report, in which a number of redundant and naïve statements stand out. In recital S, for instance, the emphasis given by ‘and its defenders’ seems, quite frankly, worth changing; and in recital AG there are some rather meaningless points: it proposes that sex tourism should be combated by the authorities, in coordination with NGOs, and also the proposal of promoting tourism initiatives controlled by the Union seems impracticable. Lastly, for the sake of propriety, in paragraph 30 one cannot ‘welcome’ the new legal basis concerning tourism established in the European Constitution, since the Constitution is now worthless, dead and buried by the outcome of the referenda and also, for example, by the Blair Government’s fear of holding any more polls in the near future. Finally, development and tourism do not require increased spending. I am against strengthening the existing services or creating new ones in the directorates-general of the European Commission, as proposed by the rapporteur."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph