Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-03-30-Speech-2-110"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-03-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040330.4.2-110"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-03-30-Speech-2-1112
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2002-03-06--2004-07-19)3,3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 member; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3,3 substitute; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3,3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3,3 substitute; Temporary committee on improving safety at sea (2003-11-20--2004-04-21)3,3 substitute; PECH (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3,3
lpv:translated text	". This report could be said to be unimportant and largely technical, but it takes on greater significance when we consider that its aim is to include, following on from the enlargement of the European Union on 1 May to encompass ten countries from Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean, the nine official languages of these countries – unless they are already used – in the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Why does this need to be emphasised? Because in other processes – such as the important example of the ‘Community patent’ – some people are looking for ‘solutions’ that do not entail full respect for the various languages of the EU’s countries but which seek to impose the languages of the countries with the largest populations and discriminate against the Union’s other official languages."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph