Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-09-23-Speech-2-136"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-09-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030923.4.2-136"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-09-23-Speech-2-1372
lpv:speaker	lp:Françoise Grossetête2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; BUDG (2002-08-29--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; EPP-ED (2002-03-08--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Cyprus Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-03-07--2004-04-30)3 unknown; Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (2002-11-18--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". I have voted in favour of this report. There is absolutely no question here of one Member State in particular being targeted; what we are trying to do is to become aware of the loopholes that exist in the implementation of the Erika I and Erika II packages, to discover the reasons for the delays in the texts’ transposition and to resolve them. There is still a considerable risk of seeing ‘floating dustbins’ – genuine weapons of mass destruction – continuing to pollute our coastlines, destroy our beaches, attack our fisheries resources, massacre birds and bring our economies to a standstill. As we know, such destruction cannot be repaired simply by throwing subsidies at it. The European Union does, however, have a legislative arsenal at its disposal in the field of maritime safety. These texts must be transposed, harmonised and fully implemented. There has been too much shilly-shallying. Today, no State with a coastline should fail to respond to this call, and this is why I have voted the way I have. Lastly, I wish to make an observation on the possible establishment of a European coastguard service. I am in favour of such a development."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph