Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-04-09-Speech-3-105"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-04-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030409.4.3-105"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-04-09-Speech-3-1062
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Thomas Nordmann2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-12-18--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Union pour la démocratie française - Parti radical (2002-07-03--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee (2003-01-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2003-01-13--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; ELDR (2003-03-06--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I voted against the Brok report, although I am in favour of enlargement. This was not of course intended as a personal affront to Mr Brok. The reason was that his report fails to take any account of the essential link between enlargement and deepening. There is no reference whatsoever to the delays regarding deepening, nor to the Convention probably becoming bogged down. The link it had been hoped to establish has been severed. This is why I voted against the Brok report. In my view however, it is unfair to penalise innocent parties for a delay that is entirely our fault. Consequently, I voted in favour of assent. I support enlargement and strengthening, and I am against agreeing to give up on strengthening. There is a danger that the Europe we are committing ourselves to will be an enlarged Europe but not a strengthened one. It will be fettered from the outset. Mr President, the reason I voted against the Brok report is that I am opposed to such fettering."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph