Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-04-09-Speech-2-013"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-04-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Decisions on urgent procedure2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020409.2.2-013"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-04-09-Speech-2-0142
lpv:speaker	lp:Ana Palacio Vallelersundi2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2002-02-07--2002-07-09)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2002-03-08--2002-07-09)3 substitute; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (2002-01-17--2002-07-09)3 unknown; Partido Popular (1999-07-20--2002-07-09)3 chair; Conference of Committee Chairs (2002-02-25--2002-07-09)3 chair; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (2002-01-21--2002-07-09)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, this proposal for a Regulation implements Resolution 1390, adopted on 16 January of this year by the United Nations Security Council, pursuant to Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations. With regard to the 30 days required for signatory States to adopt the measures that correspond to the implementation of the aforementioned United Nations Resolution, the Committee on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs yesterday voted in favour of the urgency procedure and for there to be a procedure without report, that is to say, that it should pass directly to plenary with time for amendments to be tabled by the political groups. I would ask the Presidency to set a long deadline for the tabling of amendments to take account of these circumstances. I would like to make two further observations. The first is that, in order to implement Resolutions such as Resolution 1390, the European Union should take two different types of action: one which corresponds to the second pillar, common foreign and security policy, and another within the framework of the EC Treaty. Yesterday, the Commission almost unanimously came to the conclusion that Parliament should work on the development of instruments in the second pillar, in other words, the development of the common position that is being adopted at this time. And, if Parliament is not involved, it should at very least be kept informed, for what is laid down in the Treaty is one issue, and common sense and the idea that this House is the true representative of citizens’ interests is quite another. My second observation is that the Committee on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights has expressed a great deal of concern in this regard and will formally request that the Council and those Member States that form part of the United Nations Security Council make use of those procedural mechanisms needed to correct possible non-justified inclusions of names of natural or legal persons in these lists. This is currently the cause of much public concern in EU Member States. Finally, we would ask the Commission not to force us to take this kind of action. Parliament cannot seriously be expected to support this decision with only five days notice, for it is not really a question of issuing an opinion, but of supporting this United Nations Resolution, when the Resolution was passed on 19 January. We would ask that in future we be more rapidly involved in the process of drawing up this type of Regulation in order that this Parliament can provide its support with full knowledge of the facts and not, as in this case, in a truly unbalanced effort."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph