Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-03-12-Speech-2-231"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-03-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"da"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020312.10.2-231"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-03-12-Speech-2-2322
lpv:speaker	lp:Pernille Frahm2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-06--2004-04-30)3 unknown; Socialistisk Folkeparti (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, thank you for your answer and for the attention that is being given to this matter. However, I can remember a time when no one could discover how to replace asbestos. What in reality got things moving was the desire to ban the material. I can now understand people’s wanting to make collections. That is also all well and good. However, it is of course not only a question of what happens to the material when it is worn out but also of what happens to it while it is in use. The problem is that, when in use, it emits materials that are absorbed partly into our blood, partly into our layers of fat and partly into mother’s milk. Now that there has been an investigation indicating that the quantity of brominated flame retardants in mother’s milk is forty times greater than had previously been assumed, we would ask if it might not then have been a good idea to draw up a long-term plan for when these substances might also be banned in their two aforementioned forms, which I shall refrain from trying to pronounce."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph