Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-03-12-Speech-2-217"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-03-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020312.10.2-217"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-03-12-Speech-2-2182
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America and Mexico (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2002-01-15--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2002-01-15--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 40 by Glyn Ford (): By 2015 under the new Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC, all waters in European Member States will have to have 'good' ecological status. It is clear that ever-tightening legislative requirements designed to limit, and indeed remove, environmentally damaging substances from the system act as one sort of incentive for product manufacturers and chemical companies to clean up their acts and look for alternative, 'environmentally friendly' constituents. However, are there any financial rewards or incentives available to help companies make the transition from using environmentally damaging substances – hazardous substances entering our sewer systems via our homes as a direct result of domestic product use and from industry as a result of direct discharge to sewers – to less harmful ones, and if not, does the Commission feel we should benefit from a Europe-wide scheme of this nature?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President. –"1 "Subject: Water Framework Directive"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph