Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-02-07-Speech-4-090"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020207.6.4-090"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, I offer this explanation of vote on behalf of the PPE-DE Group.
The concern of the PPE-DE Group was that, as a result of the ambiguity of its wording, Amendment No 8 to the resolution on the European judicial area could be wrongly interpreted. This wording – particularly in certain language versions – could be interpreted as meaning that the entry into force of the four measures was being replaced by that of the framework decision on terrorism.
Following Mrs Buitenweg’s clarification, we have voted in favour, because it is logical that the framework decision on terrorism should serve as an interpretative criterion for these four decisions."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples