Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-02-05-Speech-2-046"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020205.3.2-046"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
". – Mr President, both Mr Goebbels and Mrs Randzio-Plath are well aware of the answer. They know that when the comitology procedure was decided on in mid-1999, the Commission issued a unilateral declaration, which has become known as the "aerosol" declaration, which was given in exchange for something called the
another procedural device. The Commission and Council accepted that the
procedure would disappear, and in its place came this unilateral declaration, which referred to a much earlier case in connection with veterinary matters. That is why in the unilateral Commission declaration mention was made of particularly sensitive cases, because the veterinary situation back in the early 1980s concerned human health. The declaration stated – again by way of replacement of the
procedure – that the Commission would not go against a majority opinion of the Council, thereby basically maintaining the status quo, while bringing things into sharper focus.
Therefore the Stockholm resolution adds nothing beyond what was already in place under the comitology procedure, because the same words – the
that appeared in the declaration by the Commission in June 1991 reappear in the resolution of the European Council. So matters have basically remained the same.
If Mr Goebbels is asking on which article this is based, then the reply is on Articles 202 and 211."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"contre-filet"1
"ipsissima verba –"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples