Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-23-Speech-2-103"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20011023.6.2-103"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
We have voted on these nine re-appointed and newly appointed members of the Court of Auditors with mixed feelings. The EP’s role in this instance is marginal, since the Council is the designated institution. We endorse this distribution of tasks in accordance with the Treaty. However, the quality of the candidates should be paramount in the EP’s verdict. We were bitterly disappointed in this respect, both in terms of some of the Member States and in terms of the majority of the Committee on Budgetary Control.
A few candidates are, in our opinion, clearly not up to the task and, in one instance, do not even meet the Treaty requirements. A Member State that puts forward a candidate simply on the basis of a long political career, without the relevant candidate having qualifications in the area of accounts, should hang its head in shame. But also in other areas, the level of candidates was very diverse. For such a post with high accountability and a huge significance for community funds, only heavyweights in the financial-political arena should be put forward.
Since this has not happened in a few cases, we have given some the benefit of the doubt, but we were unable to give the weakest candidates our vote."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples