Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-09-06-Speech-4-057"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-09-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Sugar and preparations intended for human consumption2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010906.4.4-057"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-09-06-Speech-4-0582
lpv:speaker	lp:Hannes Swoboda2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-08--2002-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with South-east Europe (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 vice-chair; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I have no wish to hold up the vote but this morning I raised an objection to the session minutes under Rule 148(3). Rule 148(3) requires a decision by Parliament. No such decision has been taken. I just wanted to know what happens to my objection now. Secondly, I should like to point out that we decided yesterday to adopt the Commission proposal on which I reported. We then adopted a legislative resolution rejecting the Commission proposal. The services changed this in the Minutes to ‘approves the Commission proposal’. However, item 4 still contains a sentence which contradicts the first decision because it still says that the upper ceiling is to be maintained, which was something we rejected at the outset. Because of this contradiction in the current draft minutes, I have asked that the Committee on Constitutional Affairs should be instructed to look into the matter with a view to making a general amendment to the Rules of Procedure clarifying what happens when this sort of contradiction arises. I just wanted to point out that no decision has yet been taken on my objection to the minutes, as required under Article 148 (3). I assume that the Minutes have not been approved on this point and will not therefore be approved until a later date."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph