Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-04-05-Speech-4-073"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010405.6.4-073"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The Piecyk report from the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism approves the conciliation agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the criteria to be applied to seaports, inland ports and intermodal terminals so that they can become eligible for funding under the heading of the trans-European networks (TEN).
We can support the rapporteur’s determination to pursue the development of the infrastructure needed by port installations at European level. European public finance for the development of public facilities, in order to achieve better land use, balance the means of transport more effectively, and fight pollution, is undoubtedly a priority.
Public funding, however, must be for public facilities and public services. Now the ambiguity facing the European Union, which recurs in this report, revolves specifically around the future status, public or private, of port installations. On the one hand, the Council is promoting the trans-European networks, while on the other, it is planning privatisations in these sectors, as in the directive presented on 14Â February on opening up competition for port services, for example. Europe never thinks about the needs of peoples and societies, only about opening up and competition."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples