Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-04-10-Speech-1-043"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20000410.2.1-043"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr Elles, first of all, I am going to suggest that we enter Zimbabwe as the fifth sub-item in the ‘Human Rights’ section, since I believe that is in line with what we have just agreed. It is up to the House to decide. I think we are all in agreement. I shall, however, at least notify you of the other proposals, if only out of consideration for the Members and the groups which tabled them.
So, I have the proposal regarding Zimbabwe. Next, I have a request from the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance for a sub-item on ‘Human rights violations in Australia: arbitrary judgements against aborigines’. The proposal for an item on the Ethiopian famine has been withdrawn. Then there were the proposals for the item on Zimbabwe which I have already brought forward as the first item, and the proposal from the liberal group to add a sub-item on ‘Pinochet’.
Who is in favour of entering Zimbabwe as the fifth sub-item in the Human Rights section?
Regarding the oral questions on forestry, the Group of the Party of European Socialists has requested that the debate should conclude with the submission of motions for resolutions which may be tabled but not voted on.
Is there anyone who wishes to speak in favour of or against this proposal?"@en1
|
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples