Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-22-Speech-4-339-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121122.31.4-339-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-22-Speech-4-340-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Raül Romeva i Rueda2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2012-02-13--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2013-04-17)3 member; PECH (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2012-02-01--2013-03-20)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; FEMM (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Abstention. In general we supported the idea of a report addressing the issue of these two clauses. The problem with the rapporteur and also the EPP group was that they have no clear objectives and strategies. As a result, the report is extremely vague and ambiguous. For Greens there were two issues which were particularly problematic: 1) In our view there is a misunderstanding regarding the existing structures and capabilities of CSDP. The rapporteur, supported by EPP and ALDE argued that CSDP can be one instrument for the implementing both clauses. and (2) More problematic is the link to NATO and the vagueness regarding European military capabilities. The report does not clarify how NATO Art. 5 and the Mutual Assistance/Defence clause should be linked or not linked politically and militarily. In our view we cannot (mis-)use the EU Assistance clause for (indirectly) integrating countries like Ireland, Austria, Sweden, etc. into NATO and its nuclear weapons arrangements. In addition, the vagueness regarding European military capabilities is unacceptable because it does not include or exclude integrating French and British nuclear weapons into the implementation toolbox for both clauses."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE ),"1 "in writing."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph