Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-22-Speech-4-335-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121122.31.4-335-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-22-Speech-4-336-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Petru Constantin Luhan2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2011-12-20--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partidul Democrat-Liberal (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; SEDE (2012-01-19--2012-11-27)3 member; REGI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I congratulate Mr Paşcu on his ambitious and realistic report. Personally, I do not believe that we need a new European instrument, but greater coordination of our existing instruments. Let us not forget the mechanisms already at our disposal: EU Emergency and Crisis Coordination Arrangements, European Civil Protection, EEAS Crisis Response and Operational Coordination, EU Intelligence Analysis Centre, the Commission’s Strategic Analysis and Response Capability, Europol’s First Response Network, the Action plan on chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security, Atlas Network, ARGUS, and agencies such as Frontex. We must work towards coordinating, adapting or strengthening these instruments. I hope that next month the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy will define the situations in which the solidarity clause, and the mechanisms for implementing it in practice, would apply."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph