Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-20-Speech-2-440-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121120.28.2-440-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Instead of being a genuine critical analysis of the recommendations made by the quartet of the Council, the Commission, the European Central Bank and the Eurogroup, the report by Ms Thyssen (a Belgian MEP in the Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats)) endorses all of the initial proposals made by the Commission and the Council, in particular closer supervision of indebted countries, binding economic policy guidelines for the euro area countries adopted by the Commission, the implementation of the ‘two-pack’ and the need to transpose the European Stability Mechanism in all euro area countries. The repetition and reaffirmation of these well-worn phrases does not bode well for Europeans, particularly those worst off, and will not help Europe out of the crisis but instead have quite the opposite effect, as stated by a growing number of economists. It risks plunging Europe back into recession and dragging a number of other countries with it. The European Parliament has missed a unique opportunity to give its view on a process from which it was completely removed. Therefore I voted against the report."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples