Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-20-Speech-2-367-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121120.28.2-367-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-20-Speech-2-367-2502
lpv:speaker	lp:Diogo Feio2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Partido Popular (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; AFET (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; ECON (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	"The institutions of the European Union should not be excluded from the current economic and financial necessities. Nevertheless, I believe that the demise of a verbatim report of proceedings in the official languages of the Union weakens European democracy and jeopardises equality between the Member States and the commitment to multilingualism that was always viewed as a necessary cost of integration. Without a verbatim report of proceedings in their respective language, citizens will no longer be guaranteed the right to follow the work of all the MEPs during plenary sessions and to understand debates in full and the exchange of views that takes place there. I do not think this is fair, nor is it conducive towards citizens identifying more with the Union. I believe that things would be better for Parliament if its work were more concentrated, thereby saving many millions of euros a year."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph