Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-20-Speech-2-261-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121120.28.2-261-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
In a context where there is still a private monopoly on production, improving the ‘free movement of chemical substances and mixtures within the internal market’ and removing ‘distortions of competition’, while ensuring a high level of protection of workers’ safety and protection of the environment is difficult, if not impossible. It has long been known – and reality shows us – that pursuing maximum profit is incompatible with the necessary rationality of production and distribution of production by human effort. Explosives precursors are no exception to the rule. This proposal, following on from many others which have successively passed before Parliament, is aimed at improving conditions only for big business in that sector by laying down harmonised rules. Despite this, we think it is positive that, within the framework of liberalisation, a safeguard clause has been provided to allow any Member State so wishing to apply stricter measures for specific substances or mixtures of substances and to decide not to allow the general public access to any of the substances in question."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples